present Part One of an interview with Dagoberto Gutierrez held on Monday, August 3 at Channel 21 in El Salvador
Being located in the place where policy is made, ie the society, politics is not the government - is in society - every government is always a political tool, always, the government is the kingdom of bias never governs for all even if all rules. But the FMLN became the ruling party because all dirigencial dome is part of the government.
So who makes policy, who makes, who thinks, who reflects, who studies, who reads, who understands, who drives, one that is the problem.
The political right has a very clear, both the social right and the right party. Here you have to make a difference in the brain that social right and right party because sand does not express all right, many people that is not right but that is not sand I am referring to the business elites, no vote means no sand but are not strictly sandboxes within the meaning of ideological commitment, the industry class has a very clear every time.
They realize that the government of Mauricio Funes is not a threat, not a problem, they have more difficulty with - that there is an ideological match between your head and head of business leaders - for that's what we are asking the business elites is more definition. And this is very interesting because they are right and the people, social organizations that are asking for Mauricio Funes is exactly the same.
That is the right class asked for more definition and people are demanding definition, ie the government should define who is and who will rule this is the point. Because no government governs for all, that is clear is the ABC of the struggle for power. Any government rules for part of society, although that is governing all else.
This is the problem of this government, this government is trying to play to arbitration - and this is a grave error, very serious - and here I am talking to the government team in Mauritius, and I'm talking to you president, not I'm not saying anything to the party FMLN, because they do not think if they are not political, not if are reading the book in the country, I do not know, but if the government team.
Where it appeared very clear what I am saying - the game the referee - in the election of judges to the Supreme Court, this is a wonderful chapter to society the issue had never been so clear as in this chapter.
A you're told that the Supreme Court is an apolitical body, and that justice is an apolitical activity, as well look at this chapter, it all became clear Who selects the Supreme Court Justice? The Legislature, not the assembly that does not exist is a legal fiction.
What is it there? The political parties involved in the legislative assembly, political parties takes you to the Legislature and what you have left. Nothing, the content determines the continent - who elect the Supreme Court - the political parties that appeared very clear today.
"to whom we owe each justice of the supreme court? The political party that elected him and took him to the supreme court, it appears very clear today.
Each judge of the supreme court is carefully negotiated, and the suitability of each person has nothing to do with the position for which you elected. No, it has to do with the interest of the person who will vote for - that is the adequacy - to where it is negotiated in the Legislature does not, in the executive branch at the Presidential Palace, has always been so, and is normal as well. But new data appears and is that presidents have always been part of it, however today it appears as President - facilitator - this is new, and here excuse the expression thousand pardons - but here is the theoretical nonsense - the team government.
Now what is the problem today the prosecutor is the Attorney General of the Republic is the lawyer for President and usually the attorney general of the Republic must be elected with the good intention of the President but it happens that right at this moment is much need to defend their interests, and the prosecutor is in fact one of the most important officials in the country is more emblematic legal chaos that society as a whole has in mind and got a fairly committed to fiscal office with the things What the constitution says you can not do research? So for the first time here, the prosecutor should not be the president's lawyer. But the lawyer of the political that control the country, this is the issue. What is the right tax? Astor has to be, if I were the right people I fight till the end for Astor, because they understand well here we are talking about the law and science standards organizations and political power are understanding the science of law - that the standards organizations political power - and first time the people have a chance to see all of this to any cat color.
For me it is deplorable to hear the FMLN celebrate the outcome of the election of judges of the supreme court of justice, because they celebrate the procedure, and not where it belongs each judge, that is what determines who won and who lost bargaining - each judge has a political position - is that if there is too ignorant to be a judge of the supreme court to have no political stance, I fear I have a judge who said that has nothing to do with politics.
The theme is suitable for what, that's the issue. Arena right won and won a great game, brilliant. It's bad name is that it is class struggle, and I have to ensure that the Supreme Court of Justice is mine, works for me is for my area, because there is nothing more political than the act to do justice.
not given justice, "Attorney" theoretical and scientifically it is not so. Is taught and that is a hundred percent political act, each judge serves a political "party" so, you remember when all this was born in Western civilization, I am not of the Western civilization and none of us here do not belong to it. But we know these basics. When Yetro in-law of Moses says in the desert that Moses should not concentrate all the power, conseguite told some friends that are responsible for administering justice and you you keep running, there arise the judges. You know that in the Hebrew Bible is a book called judges "who were not lawyers, political leaders were" this episode is wonderful and the government says, were facilitators, "poor things" as facilitator will be the President of the Republic.
But what happens is that there is a government without a party, and a party without a government, and what is the problem between party and government? It is a political problem, not, or if political unknown, that the FMLN party holds a stony silence.
Feature Graphic The Independent 
Its most important leaders and more scholars are also part of government, or are ministers are members or are anything, are part of the apparatus. 
"I tried to do this before the dismissal of the chairman Rick Wagoner of General Motors. My column questioned whether there was a legal basis for dismissal by the government, which law permitted or authorized the federal government to fire the head of what was then a private company, and just where the Obama administration thought were their limits, if is that I had. This column was vetoed by my editors of the New York Times 
Xiomara Castro told Radio Globo, in Tegucigalpa, that the "dictatorial regime" of Micheletti not interested in reaching an agreement with the countries of the Organization of American States (OAS). 
leaders responsible for receiving popular support for the marchers in the central park of the city in recent days praised the generosity of the people in that purpose. 
